Archive for the ‘Comedy’ Category

Welcome to “Cinema Saturday,” a variation of the “Film Clip Friday” thing I tried a couple years ago.

Merry Christmas! 🙂


Read Full Post »

Here they are, in no particular order.  Feel free to share yours in the comment section! (And yes, Die Hard does count)

1. Disney’s A Christmas Carol

2. Home Alone

3. Elf

4. National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation

…and, of course…

5. It’s a Wonderful Life

Read Full Post »

If you haven’t seen this short segment, take a couple minutes to watch before reading further.  It’s quite entertaining 🙂

Well who could help being intrigued by devout atheist Bill Maher being in the lineup of Stephen Colbert, a practicing Catholic and outspoken defender of religion (both traits being anomalies in modern entertainment, to be sure).

As you can see, only a small fraction of the Maher segment dealt with religion.  But what little of the “big R” did show up packed more than enough “punch” for a spirited discussion, so here comes my response.

First, we’ll deal with the following statement:

I do admit there are things in the universe I don’t understand.  But my response to that is not to make up silly stories.

Notice that this response does not address the whole of what Colbert said.  (more…)

Read Full Post »

Going to see this movie with family later today.  Hopefully it’s half as entertaining as this 🙂

Read Full Post »

If you haven’t yet heard the buzz about “Joke With the Pope,” a project of the Pontifical Mission Societies, then you heard it here first 🙂

I’ll let Conan O’Brien explain, and then I’ll provide the link:

Link: http://www.jokewiththepope.org

Read Full Post »

enterbirdman-movie-review3mctFor parts 1 and 2, click here

This has never happened before…never once.  I sincerely thought my series on the movie “Birdman” needed a third post, but subsequent reflection and a rough draft have led me to question the necessity thereof.

But I am a firm believer in delivering on what one has promised, and so I will make a very, very brief observation.

The film ends with a hallucinatory sequence in which Riggan (Michael Keaton) encounters his alter ego, the “Birdman,” who convinces him of his almost god-like greatness; Riggan responds to this not by pursuing further superhero fame, but by going through with his Broadway play and blowing his own nose off to make it a success.

His willingness to do this to himself betrays a misguided instinct, but it suggests that he has the right idea of what makes for true greatness.

How do we become great?  By looking up.  If we look down, we are drawn to what is lower than ourselves (an interesting study of this is Gollum from J.R.R. Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy; see The Fellowship of the Ring, chapter 2).  This is how we get sucked into superficial pursuits, including that of worldly greatness.  And if we look neither up nor down but merely at ourselves, we make ourselves static and fail to go anywhere.

But to look up, to strive for the service of something higher than ourselves — this is greatness.

Christ's Wounds“Caravaggio – The Incredulity of Saint Thomas” by Original uploader was Dante Alighieri at en.wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia; transferred to Commons by User:Tm using CommonsHelper.. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons – http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caravaggio_-_The_Incredulity_of_Saint_Thomas.jpg#/media/File:Caravaggio_-_The_Incredulity_of_Saint_Thomas.jpg

And to look toward the Highest is to begin to be a saint, one who (literally or figuratively) bleeds for the One Who bled for us.

See, I told you I’d be quick 🙂

Movie still obtained through a Google image search; image of Christ from Wikipedia

Read Full Post »

BirdmanIn part one, we explored Riggan Thomson’s (Michael Keaton) departure from the world of comic book movie entertainment to enter the emotionally and artistically richer world of theater, how this shows a desire to move from superficiality to what is genuinely admirable, and how this in turn betrays a deeper quest for love.

But before we divinize Broadway, we should observe that we see the opposite extreme of Blockbuster Hollywood here: An artistic phariseeism peopled by high culture elitists who seem to think themselves better than the general populace.

lindsay_duncanIf we need a tangible embodiment of this atmosphere, we have it in theater critic Tabitha Dickinson (Lindsay Duncan).  Without knowing anything about Riggan’s play, Dickinson vows to destroy it.  She is disgusted by the thought of “spoiled” and “entitled” Hollywood actors who capitalize on cultural garbage coming into the pristine firmament of the theater thinking they can find success.

Upon encountering Riggan in a bar, she makes her authority felt in no uncertain terms: No one succeeds on the stage unless she says so.

Riggan could easily give up at this point.  This woman is the most powerful critic on the scene, and her opinion alone will make or break the play (regardless even of the audience’s response).  And discouragement is surely only compounded by the fact that Riggan has put everything he has into this project, and has nothing else left.

Okay — so what does Riggan do?  Well, he goes through with the opening performance; and when he gets to the scene in which his character commits suicide, he uses a real gun with real bullets

birdman-2014-movie-michael-keaton-riggan-thomson-gun-screenshot…and fires a real shot at himself.

Riggan_HospitalHe leaves himself alive, but without a nose.

The result is staggering.  The play gets rave reviews all over the place, including that of Tabitha Dickinson!  Commenting on the shedding of blood “both literal and figurative” on stage, she says that Riggan has reinvigorated theater with the lifeblood it has long lacked.

Let’s be clear on something: Bringing a loaded gun onto the stage during a live performance is stupid, and using it to blow your own nose off is stupider still.  But looking past the misguided particulars, what general principle(s) can we see operating here?

A legitimate question we can ask anyone — most of all ourselves — who claims to love someone or something is this: What does it cost you?  If it is love, and not just another accretion on the barque of your ego, you must prove it by somehow pouring yourself into it.

So there, I think, is the principle we are after: There is a part of each one of us that looks for something worth costing us not only sweat, but blood.  (This need not be literal, of course.  Blood is the life of the body, and has been used as a symbol of vitality for ages).  This is how we know that something is important to us, and I think it is how Tabitha knew how seriously Riggan took the theater.

Christ_Carrying_the_Cross_1580“Christ Carrying the Cross 1580” by El Greco – Web Gallery of Art:   Image  Info about artwork. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons – http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christ_Carrying_the_Cross_1580.jpg#/media/File:Christ_Carrying_the_Cross_1580.jpg

Which brings me to my concluding thought for this installment.  Many people think Catholicism, with its focus on the crucifixion and Christ’s Passion, has a pathological obsession with violence and perhaps even sadomasochistic tendencies.  But the east is nearer the west than this is to the truth of the matter.

How do we know that Jesus Christ is the God of the universe, Who holds all created reality and each one of us together (remember, as Being itself, He is to all that has life and existence what the sun is to the world lit by its rays)?  Because He bled for us.  How do we know He loves us and desires our good, and that we can trust Him with our lives (and our blood, if necessary)?  Because He bled for us.

Why are we human beings — flawed as we are — able to worship Him, to do great things for Him, and even on occasion to allow our own blood to be shed for Him as martyrs?  Because His Blood is Life abundant, Life supernatural.  Flowing from its injured Host it reinvigorates fallen mankind, just as Riggan’s blood in a sense “reinvigorated” the theater scene.

I apologize profoundly.  I really, truly thought I would be able to make it in just two posts…but it looks like I’ll need a third one.  Stay tuned, and thanks for reading.

Movie stills obtained through a Google image search; image of Christ from Wikipedia

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »